New options for validating CSS
Now that these changes are live, I'd like to go over the options you now have so that you can get the most benefit from validating your CSS with Simply Testable.
Summary of new CSS validation options
As you might now have read the previous posts on this subject, here are the four new CSS validation options:
Ignore warnings: whether to ignore CSS validator warnings, reporting only errors
Vendor extension issues: whether to ignore validator issues regarding vendor extensions, report these as warnings or report these as errors
Ignore common CDN domains: whether to ignore linked CSS resources from common content delivery networks
Ignore CSS from custom linked domains: specify domains of linked CSS to ignore
The CSS validator can report not only errors relating to invalid CSS but also warnings regarding CSS that is not invalid but which may indicate that some attention is required.
For example, you may encounter a warning telling you that you have defined the same background and text colour or you may encounter a warning stating that a given rule has been defined more than once.
You might not want to see these warnings all the time, or you might be happy with the CSS rules to which warnings relate and don't want these warnings distracting you from finding errors about which you actually care.
Choosing to ignore warnings can help you focus on more important matters.
Handling vendor extension issues
CSS specifications define a collection of properties (such as background-color or height) that can be used.
Browser creators (or, more specifically, CSS processor creators) can make use of properties specific to a given CSS processor allowing non-specified properties to exist and be used.
This is useful in cases where draft specifications strongly hint at new properties and vendors want to implement incomplete specifications to see how they're handled in the real world.
A good example is the border-radius property. This is a property introduced in CSS level 3 and first featured in a working draft of the CSS 3 border module in 2002. It currently features in a candidate recommendation of the CSS3 backgrounds and borders module and is yet to be formally specified.
Nonetheless, you can make use of this CSS3 feature using -moz-border-radius in FireFox and -webkit-border-radius in Chrome (or Safari).
Although the CSS specifications allow for vendor extensions, the CSS validator is not happy with them and will report them as warnings or errors.
In addition to choosing whether to report such issues as warnings or errors, we've added the option to ignore them entirely.
As before, being able to ignore vendor extension issues can help you focus on errors and warnings that are likely much more relevant to you.
Ignoring common CDN domains
If you link to Twitter Bootstrap or jQuery UI CSS resources, among other popular third-party frameworks and libraries, you're likely linking to a CSS resource supplied by a content delivery network (CDN) such as Google's Hosted Libraries or cdnjs.
You probably trust common third-party CSS resources to know what they're doing. If they contain invalid CSS it probably won't break anything.
You can choose to ignore CSS from common CDNs. This helps you focus on errors present in your own CSS.
Ignoring CSS from custom linked domains
This option works in partnership with ignoring CSS from common CDNs.
What if you're linking to third-party CSS resources that are not served from common CDNs?
This option lets you list domains serving CSS that you want the validator to ignore.